Fantasy, Value, and Premature Literary Criticism
I'm reading Philip Pullman, loving it, thinking about it in relation to (comparison with) the JRR Tolkien Middle Earth Project, and wondering about value.
I think Tolkien's work is immensely impressive in its imaginative scale and as a demonstration of accessible but ambitious storytelling, and I think it's educationally valuable in that it turns people into readers, writers, and explorers of the originally weird thoughts we all have. In my opinion, however, Tolkien's orcs are a very big worry. I think it's fundamentally unethical to tell war stories in which the bad guys don't have families. So. How do we teach Tolkien? (If we teach Tolkien. Which I'm pretty sure we do and I'm pretty sure we should. Because of the imagination, the fact that his work can be a gateway to literature and learning and love of stories, words, and communication.) Maybe we teach the man with the work? Explain his personal weirdness and how it contributed to his (in my opinion problematically simplified) vision of good and evil and the virtue in violence? Worth some thought I think. And then there's Pullman. I'm halfway through the second book of the His Dark Materials trilogy, and, so far, I love it. So far, it feels questioning and complicated and real. So.So far, I say teach it. For imagination. For storytelling. And for truth.Yikes. Bold statement from someone that still has 500 pages to read.

Comments [4]